Some background
Question sheet of the Korean 2021 CSAT test English language section |
Some sample 2021 Suneung questions
2021 Seuneung - Listening Comprehension section
Question 4 - Dialog
4. 대화를 듣고, 그림에서 대화의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것을 고르시오.W: Wow, Sam. You turned the student council room into a hot chocolate booth.M: Yes, Ms. Thompson. We’re ready to sell hot chocolate to raise money for children in need.W: Excellent. What are you going to put on the bulletin board under the clock?M: I’ll post information letting people know where the profits will go.W: Good. I like the banner on the wall.M: Thanks. I designed it myself.W: Awesome. Oh, I’m glad you put my stripe-patterned tablecloth on the table.M: Thanks for letting us use it. Did you notice the snowman drawing that’s hanging on the tree?W: Yeah. I remember it was drawn by the child you helped last year. By the way, there are three boxes on the floor. What are they for?M: We’re going to fill those up with donations of toys and books.W: Sounds great. Good luck.
Questions 16-17 - Monologe
16번부터 17번까지는 두 번 들려줍니다. [16∼17] 다음을 듣고, 물음에 답하시오.M: Hello, students. Last time, I gave you a list of English expressions containing color terms. Today, we’ll learn how these expressions got their meanings. The first expression is “out of the blue,” meaning something happens unexpectedly. It came from the phrase “a lightning bolt out of the blue,” which expresses the idea that it’s unlikely to see lightning when there’s a clear blue sky. The next expression, “white lie,” means a harmless lie to protect someone from a harsh truth. This is because the color white traditionally symbolizes innocence. Another expression, “green thumb,” refers to a great ability to cultivate plants. Planting pots were often covered with tiny green plants, so those who worked in gardens had green-stained hands. The last expression, “to see red,” means to suddenly get very angry. Its origin possibly comes from the belief that bulls get angry and attack when a bullfighter waves a red cape. I hope this lesson helps you remember these phrases better.
[16~17] 다음을 듣고, 물음에 답하시오.16. Which topic best describes the man's speech?16. 남자가 하는 말의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?
- color change in nature throughout seasons
- various colors used in traditional English customs
- differences in color perceptions according to culture
- why expressions related to colors are common in English
- how color-related English expressions gained their meanings
17. Which color is not mentioned?17. 언급된 색깔이 아닌 것은?
- blue
- white
- green
- red
- yellow
Question 14 - Dialog
14. 대화를 듣고, 여자의 마지막 말에 대한 남자의 응답으로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오. [3점][Cell phone rings.]M: Hello, Joe Burrow speaking.W: Hello. This is Officer Blake from the Roselyn Police Station.M: Oh, it’s good to speak to you again.W: Nice to speak to you, too. Do you remember the boy who found your briefcase and brought it here?M: Sure. I wanted to give him a reward. But he wouldn’t accept it.W: I remember you saying that before.M: Yeah. I’d still like to somehow express my thanks in person.W: Good. That’s why I’m calling you. Are you available next Friday at 10 a.m.?M: Yes. I’m free at that time. Why?W: The boy will receive the Junior Citizen Award for what he’s done for you.M: That’s great news!W: There’ll be a ceremony for him at the police station, and he invited you as his guest. I was wondering if you can make it.M: ___________________________
14. 대화를 듣고, 여자의 마지막 말에 대한 남자의 응답으로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오. [3점]Man:1. Don’t worry. I already found his briefcase.2. Of course. You deserve to receive the award.3. Don’t mention it. I just did my duty as a citizen.4. Definitely. I want to go to congratulate him myself.5. Wonderful. It was the best ceremony I’ve ever been to.
2021 Seuneung - Reading Comprehension section
- Identify the topic of the passage
- Place the sentences or paragraphs in the correct order
- Identify words that are incorrectly used in the passage
- Choose the most appropriate words or sentences to complete the passage
Question 23 - Topic
다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은? [3점]Difficulties arise when we do not think of people and machines as collaborative systems, but assign whatever tasks can be automated to the machines and leave the rest to people. This ends up requiring people to behave in machine-like fashion, in ways that differ from human capabilities. We expect people to monitor machines, which means keeping alert for long periods, something we are bad at. We require people to do repeated operations with the extreme precision and accuracy required by machines, again something we are not good at. When we divide up the machine and human components of a task in this way, we fail to take advantage of human strengths and capabilities but instead rely upon areas where we are genetically, biologically unsuited. Yet, when people fail, they are blamed.
- difficulties of overcoming human weaknesses to avoid failure
- benefits of allowing machines and humans to work together
- issues of allocating unfit tasks to humans in automated systems
- reasons why humans continue to pursue machine automation
- influences of human actions on a machine’s performance
Question 25 - Graph reading
25. 다음 도표의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은?The graph above shows the online shares of retail sales for each of six countries in 2012 and in 2019. The online share of retail sales refers to the percentage of retail sales conducted online in a given country. ① For each country, its online share of retail sales in 2019 was larger than that in 2012. ② Among the six countries, the UK owned the largest online share of retail sales with 19.7% in 2019. ③ In 2019, the U.S. had the second largest online share of retail sales with 16.5%. ④ In 2012, the online share of retail sales in the Netherlands was larger than that in France, whereas the reverse was true in 2019. ⑤ In the case of Spain and Italy, the online share of retail sales in each country was less than 5.0% both in 2012 and in 2019.
Question 37 - Arrangement
주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오.Experts have identified a large number of measures that promote energy efficiency. Unfortunately many of them are not cost effective. This is a fundamental requirement for energy efficiency investment from an economic perspective.(A)And this has direct repercussions at the individual level: households can reduce the cost of electricity and gas bills, and improve their health and comfort, while companies can increase their competitiveness and their productivity. Finally, the market for energy efficiency could contribute to the economy through job and firms creation.(B)There are significant externalities to take into account and there are also macroeconomic effects. For instance, at the aggregate level, improving the level of national energy efficiency has positive effects on macroeconomic issues such as energy dependence, climate change, health, national competitiveness and reducing fuel poverty.(C)However, the calculation of such cost effectiveness is not easy: it is not simply a case of looking at private costs and comparing them to the reductions achieved. [3점][Blog author note: vocabulary that is considered highly specialized or difficult are provided with Korean translations in the test. For this question, the following 2 words and their translations are included.]* repercussion: 반향, 영향 ** aggregate: 집합의
- (A)-(C)-(B)
- (B)-(A)-(C)
- (B)-(C)-(A)
- (C)-(A)-(B)
- (C)-(B)-(A)
Question 42 - Incorrect word
[41~42] 다음 글을 읽고, 물음에 답하시오.Our irresistible tendency to see things in human terms ― that we are often mistaken in attributing complex human motives and processing abilities to other species ― does not mean that an animal’s behavior is not, in fact, complex. Rather, it means that the complexity of the animal’s behavior is not purely a (a) product of its internal complexity. Herbert Simon’s “parable of the ant” makes this point very clearly. Imagine an ant walking along a beach, and (b) visualize tracking the trajectory of the ant as it moves. The trajectory would show a lot of twists and turns, and would be very irregular and complicated. One could then suppose that the ant had equally complicated (c) internal navigational abilities, and work out what these were likely to be by analyzing the trajectory to infer the rules and mechanisms that could produce such a complex navigational path. The complexity of the trajectory, however, “is really a complexity in the surface of the beach, not a complexity in the ant.” In reality, the ant may be using a set of very (d) complex rules: it is the interaction of these rules with the environment that actually produces the complex trajectory, not the ant alone. Put more generally, the parable of the ant illustrates that there is no necessary correlation between the complexity of an (e) observed behavior and the complexity of the mechanism that produces it.
42. 밑줄 친 (a)~(e) 중에서 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은? [3점]
- (a)
- (b)
- (c)
- (d)
- (e)
Final Thoughts
Naver will return a convenient onebox result linking to all the relevant question and answer sheets from all main subjects in the test, including English, Korean, math, Korean history, other foreign languages (particularly Chinese), and other subjects like social studies, etc. All of this material is made available free for students' personal study use.
Comments
- 2021
- 2022
If you want others, the whole list is in the quick box results on Naver
If you went to a school 100% run by the state, it was the easy mode where the exam was broken into different sections. That is, history+geography+sciences, french, dutch, mathematics, civism.
If you were in a catholic school, the teacher would hand off a pile of sheets with various documents. The questions would often require you to peruse the whole thing to grab the required information and use what you had to learn by heart.
In a state-run school, a question would be like this: "Complete this pyramid where each brick is the sum of the two below it."
In Catholic school, that would be: "Which frequency does a dragonfly flap?" you would have to remember there was a text about the dragonfly, see that it says it takes x of a second to flap, and realize you have to take the inverse.
So, it would be fantastic if you had only 60% in catholic school. If you did less than 80% on the state exam, you had a severe issue ^^
Also, the strategies were vastly different.
For the "state school" exam, you had to do mostly memorization of prior exercises to be able to quickly proceed through each section and quickly skip.
For the "catholic school" exam, you had to rely on your thinking as curve balls were common. It was also good practice to read the whole paper before answering the first question to remember as much as you can to not lose time going forth and back. It's also how you could see who was failing the exam: those flipping the sheet-like crazy.
The only part that was separate was listening comprehension and the dictation. It was kind of a break in the middle of your exam.
The nice thing was that because you had all the booklet, you were also able to better manage your time. While in the "state" one, if you were stuck in a section, you had to wait until timeout to proceed to the next session.
Now, those are unified and it's the easier one that is given to everyone. So, people from catholic school just smash it. Except for dictation of course.
I did prefer the catholic one, simply because it was more interesting and the ability to allocate your time as you want was a big plus.
Because of this, even today, catholic school are seen as having a higher standard and being more difficult. But no, the level dropped ^^
Even people at the end of secondary school would not complete 1990 catholic school exam!